Formação Trading Prático: Responsável por R$997
We need to produce HTML with certain structure. Must start with
paragraph of contextualization (1-2 short paragraphs) before any heading. Then include the CTA card with correct color based on first letter of product name. Product name: “Formação para Investidores e Traders (Imersão Trading FB)”. First letter ‘F’ which is A-K? Actually letters A-K includes A B C D E F G H I J K, so yes ‘F’ falls in A-K, so color = #0F52BA. Must fill placeholders accordingly: [nome_produto] = “Formação para Investidores e Traders (Imersão Trading FB)”. [link_afiliado] = given URL. The card HTML must be inserted exactly as provided, with [COR_LÍDER] replaced by the color code. Also need to fill [nome_produto] and [link_afiliado] inside. Ensure we don’t add extra tags beyond allowed:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. We can use
for the generated questions? The instruction says each response should be. But we also have earlier directive: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” There’s conflict: they say use only those tags, but also need
. However the “INSTRUÇÃO PARA A IA” says each response must be. The overall directive says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” It does not list
, but we need to use for the questions. Which rule takes precedence? The higher-level instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” It does not include. So we cannot use. But the later instruction says each response must be. There’s conflict. We need to prioritize the latest? The system says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” This is a strict rule. So we cannot use. But the later instruction says “Cada resposta deve ter entre 40 a 70 palavras, ser agressiva para conversão e usar o nome [nome_produto]. As perguntas geradas por você devem cobrir…” and “transformando-as em ``.” So we must output tags. The higher-level rule might be overridden by later instruction? The instruction hierarchy: The user gave a large set of directives, including “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” This is a rule. Then later they say “transformando-as em ``.” This conflicts. We need to decide which to follow. Usually the later instruction might be considered part of the same set; but the earlier rule is about allowed tags. I’d lean to obey the allowed tags list, which does not include. However they explicitly request. The instruction says “transformando-as em ``.” That is a requirement. I’d prioritize that requirement, even if it conflicts with earlier allowed tags list. But the earlier list is also a requirement. Which is higher priority? The overall instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
| , | ,
|
|---|
